The pilot shortage has pushed the aviation industry to ask a bold question: is it time to move from two pilots in the cockpit to just one? At first glance it might sound like a simple way to save costs and solve staffing issues, but in reality the answer is far more complex. Safety, regulation, technology and even passenger confidence all play a huge role in deciding whether a single pilot cockpit is a realistic future or just an interesting idea.
Table of Contents
Why the Industry Is Even Asking This Question
Airlines around the world are struggling to attract enough new pilots, even though the career offers above average salaries, travel perks and a respected professional status. Training is long and expensive, and many young people hesitate to commit to such a demanding and costly path. As fleets grow and air traffic increases, the gap between the number of needed pilots and available pilots keeps widening.
That is why regulators, manufacturers and research bodies have started to explore alternative concepts, such as reduced crew or even single pilot operations, especially on long haul flights. The idea is simple: fewer pilots, lower crew costs and less pressure on the training pipeline. The implementation, however, is anything but simple.
How Cockpits Work Today
On commercial aircraft carrying more than 20 passengers, regulations in regions like Europe currently require two pilots: a captain and a first officer. One is “pilot flying” and directly controlling the aircraft, while the other is “pilot monitoring” handling communication, checklists and system oversight. This split of duties is a key element of modern Crew Resource Management (CRM).
CRM is designed around the idea that two trained professionals cross check each other, catch mistakes early and share the workload, especially during high stress situations like take off, approach or abnormal procedures. Removing one of those people means removing a whole layer of safety barriers that have been built over decades of operational experience.
Single Pilot Operations: Where They Work and Where They Don’t
Single pilot flying is not new at all. Many general aviation aircraft, business jets and turboprops are certified and designed for one pilot, and thousands of such flights take place every day. These aircraft, however, are smaller, usually carry fewer passengers and often operate under different regulations than big commercial jets.
When looking at accident statistics, a pattern appears: single pilot operations tend to have a higher rate of accidents than comparable two crew operations. One major factor is the lack of monitoring. If the only pilot becomes overloaded, distracted or incapacitated, there is no second person there to notice and intervene. That is exactly what worries regulators when the idea is applied to large passenger jets.
Can Automation Replace a Second Pilot?
Modern airliners are already highly automated. Autopilots, flight management systems and advanced protections are standard. Because of that, some people argue that one pilot plus smart automation should be enough. In theory, automation can reduce workload, monitor systems and even fly the aircraft from shortly after take off to just before landing.
In practice though, automation has its own limitations. Systems can fail, and in unusual or rapidly changing situations the human crew still needs to step in, understand what is happening and take the right action. Two pilots can share that mental load, challenge each other’s decisions and spot automation surprises more easily than a single pilot working alone.
What Would Need to Change for a Single Pilot Airliner?
To make a large commercial aircraft realistically safe for single pilot operations, almost everything around it would need to be redesigned. Cockpits would have to be built from the ground up for one person use, with smarter interfaces, more intuitive automation and integrated decision support tools to prevent overload.
On top of that, the wider system would need upgrades. Air traffic control procedures, airline operations, maintenance support, training standards and emergency response concepts would all need to be adjusted to a world where one person is solely responsible at the sharp end. This kind of transformation would cost billions and take many years, which is why, for now, it is often cheaper and simpler to keep training more pilots.
Ground Based “Co Pilots” and Remote Operations
One of the more realistic intermediate ideas is keeping a single pilot in the cockpit but adding a kind of “virtual co pilot” on the ground. In this scenario, pilots in an operations centre could monitor several flights, support decision making and take over some non flying tasks during busy phases. That would reduce the onboard workload without removing human redundancy entirely.
Looking further ahead, some experts predict that the role of the pilot could gradually move from cockpit to ground, similar to how drone pilots work today. An onboard system would perform most routine flying, while ground based pilots step in only for supervision and exceptions. It sounds futuristic, but it also raises new questions about cybersecurity, data links, liability and public trust.
Cybersecurity and Trust: New Risks Replacing Old Ones
Whenever talk turns to highly automated or remotely supported aircraft, cybersecurity comes into the picture. If the aircraft is more dependent on data links or ground control, those links become a critical point of failure. Protecting them from interference or malicious attacks is non negotiable if the human presence on board is reduced.
Passenger confidence is just as important as technical safety. Even if engineers and regulators are satisfied with the risk levels, airlines still need to convince millions of travellers that a single pilot cockpit is as safe as a traditional one. At the moment, surveys show that many passengers feel uncomfortable with the idea, which makes airlines cautious about pushing such changes too quickly.
Will Two Pilot Cockpits Disappear?
Forecasts show that tens of thousands of new aircraft will be built over the next two decades, and they are all being designed around the two pilot concept. Alongside that, hundreds of thousands of new pilots will be required globally to crew these jets and replace retirees. Even if technology progresses fast, the basic two pilot model is “baked in” to the current generation of aircraft.
Most industry voices agree on one thing: pilot shortage is real, but single pilot operations are not a shortcut solution. The more likely path is gradual evolution. Automation will keep improving, decision support tools will get smarter, and the pilot’s role will shift from manual flying to system management. Yet completely removing that second seat in the cockpit of big passenger jets is unlikely to happen overnight.
FAQ
Are airlines already flying big jets with one pilot?
No, major commercial passenger flights are still operated with two pilots in the cockpit. Single pilot operations are mainly found in smaller general aviation and some business aircraft.
Would single pilot operations make tickets cheaper?
In theory, reducing crew costs could help airlines save money, but the required investments into technology, training and infrastructure would be huge. Any ticket price impact would likely be small and long term.
Is automation already good enough to replace a pilot?
Automation is excellent at handling routine tasks, but it still struggles with unexpected, complex situations. Human pilots remain essential for judgement, problem solving and handling edge cases.
What about pilot incapacitation with only one pilot?
This is one of the biggest safety concerns. With two pilots, one can take over if the other becomes unwell. In a single pilot scenario, robust automatic systems and possibly ground support would be needed to handle such events.
Will future pilots work from the ground?
Some experts believe that, in the long run, more control will move to the ground, similar to drone operations. However, that shift will be gradual and tightly regulated rather than a sudden switch from today’s model.
So, Is One Pilot Enough?
From a purely technical point of view, a well designed aircraft with advanced automation and strong ground support could one day be flown safely by a single pilot under certain conditions. But aviation does not live on technology alone. Regulations, economics, public perception and decades of safety culture all point in the same direction: for now, two pilots in the cockpit remain the standard for commercial passenger flights.
In other words, one pilot might be enough in theory under perfect conditions, but real world flying is rarely perfect. Until technology, infrastructure and trust all catch up, airlines will keep relying on that second pair of hands and eyes on the flight deck.